Rare Book Monthly

Articles - April - 2023 Issue

Roald Dahl and Censorship

Was Dodd Mead “woke” when they changed the title?

Was Dodd Mead “woke” when they changed the title?

We have written recently about library censorship, school libraries in particular, where angry people, or worse yet, the government has stepped in to censor books. The major topics that have led to such bans have been LGTBQ issues and “critical race theory,” a theory that says that difficult conditions racial minorities face, such as lower job opportunities or poverty, can in part be traced back to discriminatory conditions in the past. However, of late, there have been claims of censorship of a different sort, where old books have either been discontinued or some of the author's words have been changed to better meet current standards.

 

The most notable example of this today has to do with some of Roald Dahl's books. Similar claims were made a couple of years ago regarding six of Dr. Seuss' books. Dahl had used terms for people we could see as insensitive today. He used descriptive terms such as “ugly,” “fat” and “crazy.” That doesn't sound all that controversial to me, but then again, an essay by a handicapped person made me think a bit more deeply. In older books, handicapped people were often depicted in a negative light. Heroes were healthy virile men and beautiful women, villains the opposite. The essay was an appeal to have handicapped people depicted the same as others. It makes you stop and think how they must feel about negative portrayals.

 

What this led to was a decision by The Roald Dahl Story Company, owner of the rights to Dahl's works, and publisher Puffin Books, to update some of these words in Dahl's stories. This was done in cooperation with a group called Inclusive Minds, who specialize in making children's books inclusive and more accessible to all children. Along with updated words they have made a number of words gender neutral, such as “not ladylike” changed to “undignified.” Puffin will now make Dahl's books available in this new more sensitive edition along with the original version. People can choose. This is reminiscent of an earlier move by Dr. Seuss Enterprises to stop publishing six of Seuss' titles with depictions of minorities that were not thought of as being offensive many decades ago by those not part of the minority, but recognized differently today. Why they chose not to make minor changes instead I do not know. I never found Dahl's work particularly interesting, so I can't judge whether changes are appropriate, but I loved Seuss (and still do).

 

These changes raise some important questions with no obvious answers. Is it fair and appropriate to change an author's words without their permission? If they are older books, chances are the author is dead so we don't know how they would feel. Knowing Dahl's personality, I think he would have been peeved. Sensitivity was not his strong suit and he had no problem being offensive, even by the standards of his times. Theodor Geisel, aka Dr. Seuss, was a different type of person, one who I imagine would have made such changes himself to eliminate stereotypes that he did not realize were insensitive at the time but would have today. It would be like George Washington, who owned slaves in his day, but I am quite certain if he were alive today he would not be advocating the reintroduction of slavery. Do the likely feelings of Dahl and Geisel matter today? Yes they do, but to what extent I don't know.

 

Some find changing books a literary wrong. That is certainly a compelling argument. I don't like the concept at all, though I think context makes a big difference. If a recent book referred to Barack Obama or Colin Powell with the n-word that would be totally disgusting and I cannot imagine a reputable publisher allowing that to stand. But what about Mark Twain's character Ni**er Jim? That is really essential to the time and place of the story. Calling him African American Jim would be untrue to its time, not just a simple word substitution. Even children need to get an accurate reading of history, the bad with the good. Ironically, the republishing of old books that display prejudices minorities experienced might well have the effect of teaching critical race theory to children who are sympathetic to the underdog.

 

It needs to be remembered that changing words is not something new, the outcome strictly of recent critical race theory or “wokeism.” In 1939, famed mystery writer Agatha Christie published a book titled, Ten Little Ni**ers. However, when Dodd Mead published the American edition in 1940, they changed the title to And Then There Were None. Were they being “woke” when they concluded the title was too offensive, even in 1940 when segregation was still permissible in schools and public places, while degrading black minstrel shows were thought to be funny? Should the original title be restored? I think not. Anyone who thinks so, please raise your hand.

 

Regardless of how you feel about updating words in older books, there is one more thing it is important to know. This has nothing to do with censorship, though certain people try to frame it this way. No government authority has banned Dahl's or Seuss' books in any library. Nor have I seen any angry confrontations or threats hurled at library boards and staff over their books. These decisions have been made by those who own the rights to these books. They have chosen to offer alternate versions or take some off the market and that is an owner's right. They were not forced to do it by politicians or anyone else.

 

There is also one other major difference between this and serious censorship. No one is trying to change the ideas Dahl and Seuss were promoting, whatever they might be. They have attempted to reduce offensiveness by substituting less offensive synonyms, which may or may not be a literary style travesty but does not interfere with the author's expression of their ideas. Their ideas have not been silenced. What has gone on in places like Florida is not the substitution of the word “gay” for “homosexual,” it is preventing children from hearing the message that people who are not heterosexual should not be mocked, threatened, humiliated, and degraded because of circumstances beyond their control. It is the banning of ideas, not a few words (as has regularly been done with swear words), that is the essence of censorship.


Posted On: 2023-04-01 03:48
User Name: midsomer

Classroom instruction by school personnel or third parties on sexual orientation or gender identity may not occur in kindergarten through grade 3 or in a manner that is not age appropriate or developmentally appropriate for students in accordance with state standards.

Hmmm. Doesn’t sound like discrimination. Just age appropriateness. Unless you think traditional sex education classes for middle and high schoolers should be given to 5 year olds.


Posted On: 2023-04-01 04:49
User Name: ae244155

Third graders aren't 5 years old. Children who are "different," racially, physically, or by gender identity are often subject to bullying, ridicule and such. Kids can be cruel, not because they are mean-spirited, but because they don't understand. A teacher who tries to explain these differences aren't because the gay kid is bad and tries to get classmates to understand and accept him could be sent to jail in Florida. In what other state is that true? When it comes to teaching these important life lessons to young children, that is best left to teachers, people who train for this job, spend their days with all types of children, accept pay levels that will never make them rich, but do it out of love for children, not to politicians who like to advance themselves, rake in lots of money, and have no problem attacking even the most vulnerable of children if it helps them get elected.


Posted On: 2023-04-02 04:52
User Name: vaccinia

Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right....

The object of power is power. Don’t you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought? In the end we shall make thoughtcrime literally impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it.

Literature originally written as satirical allegory, now used as a political playbook by the very persons it originally was meant to describe. How Apropos....


Rare Book Monthly

  • Sotheby's
    Fine Books, Manuscripts & More
    Available for Immediate Purchase
    Sotheby’s: J.R.R. Tolkien. The Lord of the Rings Trilogy. 11,135 USD
    Sotheby’s: Edgar Allan Poe. The Raven and Other Poems, 1845. 33,000 USD
    Sotheby’s: Leo Tolstoy, Clara Bow. War and Peace, 1886. 22,500 USD
    Sotheby’s: Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. Adventures of Sherlock Holmes, 1902. 7,500 USD
    Sotheby’s: F. Scott Fitzgerald. This Side of Paradise, The Great Gatsby, and Others, 1920-1941. 24,180 USD
  • Freeman’s | Hindman
    Fine Printed Books and Manuscripts, Including Americana
    November 14
    Freeman’s | Hindman, Nov. 14: LEROUX, Gaston. The Phantom of the Opera. FIRST AM. ED, FIRST ISSUE IN THE VERY RARE DUST JACKET. 1911. $6,000 – 8,000.
    Freeman’s | Hindman, Nov. 14: GOULD, John. A Monograph of the Trochilidae...Humming-Birds. L., [1849-] 1861. $60,000 – 80,000.
    Freeman’s | Hindman, Nov. 14: A COMPLETE RUN of Limited Editions Club publications, v.p. [mostly New York], 1929-2010. $50,000 – 60,000.
    Freeman’s | Hindman, Nov. 14: ORWELL, George. Nineteen Eighty-Four. Lon., 1949. FIRST EDITION IN A VERY FINE DUST JACKET. $6,000 – 8,000.
    Freeman’s | Hindman, Nov. 14: GOULD. A Monograph of the Ramphastidae...Toucans. L., [1852-] 54. SECOND ED. $35,000 – 45,000.
    Freeman’s | Hindman, Nov. 14: The Federalist. NY, 1788. FIRST EDITION, THICK PAPER COPY. $60,000 – 80,000.
    Freeman’s | Hindman, Nov. 14: SELBY. Plates to Selby’s Illustrations of British Ornithology. Edin., [1833-] 34. $20,000 – 30,000.
  • Gros & Delettrez, 7 November:
    APRES DE MANNEVILLETTE
    Le Neptune Oriental
    Gros & Delettrez, 7 November:
    CASSAS
    Eaux fortes de la Sicile et quelques vues d’Espagne
    Gros & Delettrez, 7 November:
    CASSINI DE THURY
    Carte générale et particulière de la France.
    Gros & Delettrez, 7 November:
    JOUY; GARNERAY
    Vues des côtes de France dans l'Océan et dans la Méditerranée
    Gros & Delettrez, 7 November:
    LA PÉROUSE
    Voyage autour du monde
    Gros & Delettrez, 7 November:
    LE GENTIL DE LA GALAISIERE
    Voyage dans les Mers de l’Inde
    Gros & Delettrez, 7 November:
    LICENT
    Hoang Ho, Pai Ho, Loan Ho, Leao Ho. Itinéraires suivis dans le bassin du golfe du Pei Tcheuly
    Gros & Delettrez, 7 November:
    FRENCH SCHOOL FROM THE 19th CENTURY
    Panorama d’Athènes
    Gros & Delettrez, 7 November:
    PEETERS
    Description des principales villes, havres et isles du golfe de Venise
    Gros & Delettrez, 7 November:
    PÉRON; FREYCINET
    Voyage de découverte aux terres australes
    Gros & Delettrez, 7 November:
    STACKELBERG
    La Grèce : vues pittoresques et topographiques.
    Gros & Delettrez, 7 November:
    VALENTINER
    Atlas des Sonnensystems.
  • Forum Auctions
    Online Sale:
    The Detective Fiction Collection of John Cooper
    Ending 7th November, 2024
    Forum, Nov. 7: Christie (Agatha). The Thirteen Problems, first edition, The Crime Club, 1932. £15,000 to £20,000.
    Forum, Nov. 7: Christie (Agatha). Dumb Witness, first edition, 1937. £3,000 to £4,000.
    Forum, Nov. 7: Christie (Agatha). Cards on the Table, first edition, The Crime Club, 1936. £2,000 to £3,000.
    Forum, Nov. 7: [Carr (John Dickson)], "Carter Dickson" and John Rhode. Drop to his Death, first edition, Heinemann, [1939]. £600 to £800.
    Forum, Nov. 7: Berkeley (Anthony). Jumping Jenny, first edition, Hodder and Stoughton, 1933. £800 to £1,200.
    Forum Auctions
    Online Sale:
    The Detective Fiction Collection of John Cooper
    Ending 7th November, 2024
    Forum, Nov. 7: Marsh (Ngaio). Overture to Death, first edition, The Crime Club, 1939. £600 to £800.
    Forum, Nov. 7: [Day-Lewis (Cecil)] "Nicholas Blake". The Beast Must Die, first edition, 1938. £750 to £1,000.
    Forum, Nov. 7: Brand (Christianna). Green for Danger, first edition, signed presentation inscription from the author, John Lane the Bodley Head, 1945. £600 to £800.
    Forum, Nov. 7: Christie (Agatha). Murder is Easy, first edition, signed by the author, 1939. £3,000 to £4,000.
    Forum, Nov. 7: Sayers (Dorothy L.) Lord Peter Views the Body, first edition, Gollancz, 1928. £6,000 to £8,000.
  • RareBookBuyer.com
    We Buy Librairies & Rare Books Nationwide
    ABAA Dealer
    RareBookBuyer.com
    Specialized in Purchasing
    Institutional Collections & Deacccessioned Books
    RareBookBuyer.com
    We Buy Librairies & Rare Books Nationwide
    ABAA Dealer
    RareBookBuyer.com
    Specialized in Purchasing
    Institutional Collections & Deacccessioned Books
    RareBookBuyer.com
    We Buy Librairies & Rare Books Nationwide
    ABAA Dealer
    RareBookBuyer.com
    Specialized in Purchasing
    Institutional Collections & Deacccessioned Books
    RareBookBuyer.com
    We Buy Librairies & Rare Books Nationwide
    ABAA Dealer
    RareBookBuyer.com
    Specialized in Purchasing
    Institutional Collections & Deacccessioned Books
    RareBookBuyer.com
    We Buy Librairies & Rare Books Nationwide
    ABAA Dealer

Article Search

Archived Articles